Khankrumthebulgar asked: On Valentine’s Day an attorney filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in NY seeking to declare the Violence Against Women’s Act as unconstitutional. And that it is discriminatory. Violates the Equal Protection clause of the US Constitution.
Not addressed is IMBRA the rider that criminalizes all US Men who attempt to communicate via the internet with Foreign Women. We have no declared that US Men have no rights to freedom of Association, unless its Government approved.
What are your thoughts on the Law suit and IMBRA?
Federal lawsuit charges parts of the Violence against Women Act are unconstitutional.
Attorney Roy Den Hollander filed on February 14th, a suit in the U.S. Southern District Court of N.Y. attacking sections of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and other U.S. statutes for violating the Constitutional rights of American men who marry alien females.
The defendants are the United States of America, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Executive Office of Immigration Review, No. 08 CV 01521. Roy Den Hollander is the sole plaintiff. Hollander has also sued in a New York State court to have Ladies Nights declared discriminatory in New York City nightclubs and bars.
The VAWA infringes American mens rights to freedom of speech, freedom of choice in marital relationships, right of access to deportation proceedings, procedural due process, and equal protection under the law in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The unconstitutional statutes, enacted at the behest of the feminist lobby, create a fast track to permanent U.S. residency and citizenship for alien wives or ex-wives of American husbands whenever the alien female alleges abuse. Once she mentions the magic words -battery- or -extreme cruelty-, the Government institutes secret, -Star Chamber- immigration proceedings to determine whether the citizen husband is responsible, and, if yes, grants the alien female permanent U.S. residency. The American husband or ex-husband receives no notice of the proceedings, has no opportunity to defend his name, and the Government’s findings of abuse are based almost exclusively on what the alien female says. The feminist lobby created the statutes in order to deter American men from looking overseas for wives. If a marriage to a foreign wife does not workout, the alien female can falsely and opportunistically accuse her American husband of -battery- or -extreme cruelty- and he will have no opportunity to prove his innocence. The husband is barred from the proceedings that are conducted behind closed doors and any evidence that the Government might receive from him is discarded. So not only is the husband presumed guilty, but he is not even allowed to prove differently.
Hollander says -the feminists did not create these statutes out of bleeding hearts for alien wives but to intimidate American men into shopping at home for wives. He notes that, if an American wife accuses her husband of abuse, he at least gets his day in court and the abuse has to fit specific legal definitions. But under the VAWA, a husband can be found guilty of -battery- and -extreme cruelty- for anything from an -offensive- remark to felony assault.
IMBRA requires US Men who wish to exchange information with and to meet Foreign Women. To submit to a Criminal Background Check, and to provide detailed identity information. Making them more vulnerable to Identity Theft and scams. It presumes that American Men are violent Sexual Criminals and Abusers. Yahoo.com, Match.com and a few others are exempt.
It is a blatant attempt to create a barrier to entry for Foreign Women. A defacto Tarriff to keep them out of the US and American Men with American Women.
Create a video blog…instantly.
